MB1–MB2 Canal Orifice Distance in Maxillary First and Second Molars:
A CBCT Study in a Rajasthan Population
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the distance between the mesiobuccal canal orifices (MB1 and MB2) in maxillary first and second molars in a Rajasthan population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: CBCT scans of maxillary first and second molars were evaluated in the axial plane at the level of the pulpal floor. The linear distance between the centers of the MB1 and MB2 canal orifices was measured using dedicated CBCT software. Measurements were statistically analyzed and comparisons were made between first and second molars and between genders.
Results: The mean MB1–MB2 distance was 1.58 ± 0.72 mm in maxillary first molars and 1.97 ± 0.74 mm in maxillary second molars. The difference between first and second molars was statistically significant (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between males and females (p = 0.923).
Conclusion: Knowledge of MB1–MB2 inter-orifice distances in maxillary molars may assist clinicians in more predictable location of the MB2 canal and improve endodontic treatment outcomes.
References
2. Deepak BS, Subbiya A, Vivekanandhan P, PradeepKumar AR, Muthu MS, Baghkomeh PN, et al. Evaluation of MB1–MB2 distances and canal configuration in maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography in an Indian population. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25:357-62.
3. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography and digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13:65-70.
4. Patel S, Horner K. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12:53-6.
5. Gupta S, Sinha DJ, Singh UP, Mishra V, Singh V, Arora R, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary molars in an Indian subpopulation. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:162-6.
6. Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod. 2006;32:813-21.
7. Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population. J Endod. 2012;38:1063-9.
8. Al-Dahman YH, Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Alsubait S, Almulhim A, Alharbi F, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of MB2 canal in maxillary first molars in a Saudi sub-population. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33:229-35.
9. Sirirangsee P, Chompu-Inwai P, Sinchai T, Thongudomporn U, Mangkornkarn C, et al. Location of the MB2 canal orifice of maxillary first molars in a Thai population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Mahidol Dent J. 2023;43:65-74.
10. Nair PN. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:348-81.
