Emerging Role of Robotics in Prosthodontics: Clinical Integration and Future Trends
Integration of Robotics in Prosthodontics
Abstract
The integration of robotics in prosthodontics is redefining traditional concepts of oral rehabilitation by introducing unprecedented precision, automation, and consistency in both clinical and laboratory procedures. Robotics bridges digital dentistry with advanced engineering, enabling seamless workflows that extend from intraoral scanning and virtual treatment planning to the fabrication, adjustment, and quality control of prosthetic components. Robotic systems are increasingly being used for dynamic simulation of mandibular movements, full-arch rehabilitation planning, and automated milling or 3D printing processes, thereby elevating the accuracy of occlusal design and improving the predictability of treatment outcomes.
In clinical settings, robotic-assisted implant placement and jaw-movement tracking systems enhance prosthesis fit, optimize load distribution, and reduce human error. Laboratory applications, such as robotic manipulation, automated polishing, and AI-assisted design algorithms, streamline repetitive tasks and improve efficiency, allowing dental technicians to focus on higher-level craftsmanship. Emerging technologies—including haptic-feedback robotics, soft robotics, and autonomous prosthetic fabrication—are expected to further expand the scope of digital prosthodontics through improved adaptability and minimally invasive workflows.
This narrative review synthesizes current evidence and technological advancements to provide a comprehensive overview of robotic applications across fixed, removable, and implant-supported prosthodontics. It also discusses challenges related to cost, training, integration complexity, and standardization. By consolidating contemporary knowledge, the review aims to equip practitioners, educators, and researchers with a deeper understanding of how robotics is transforming prosthodontic care, ultimately contributing to enhanced precision, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes.
References
2. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives. J Prosthodont Res. 2009;53(2):77–84.
3. Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: Systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(6):361–6.
4. Block MS, Emery RW. Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement—choosing the method of guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(2):269–77.
5. Scherer M, Holmes C, Papaspyridakos P. Digital workflow for fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2020;64(2):229–44.
6. Reissmann DR, Sierwald I, Berger F, Heydecke G. Clinical performance of dental students in a robotic patient simulation: Objective structured clinical examination and self-assessment. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(9):1031–8.
7. Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Virtual articulation in the digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(1):128–30.
8. Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2015;219(11):521–9.
9. Kois JC. Predictable single-tooth implants: a prosthodontic perspective. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25(11):889–98.
10. Glassman P, Subar P. Improving oral health for people with special needs. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(3):605–20.
11. Modjaw [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.modjaw.com
12. KaVo Dental ARCUSdigma [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.kavo.com
13. Neocis Yomi Robotic System [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.neocis.com
14. Bidra AS. Robotic surgery and prosthodontics: A future symbiosis? J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(3):317–8.
15. Joda T, Gallucci GO. The virtual patient in dental medicine. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(Suppl 21):236–41.
