Bridging Aesthetics and Function : Full-Coverage Restoration Using Bioflx and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars - A Case Report

Abstract

Aims and Objectives:
In the aesthetic world of today, both prefabricated Zirconia and Bioflx crowns have emerged as promising options, as alternatives to stainless steel crowns. The aim of this case report is to compare the clinical effectiveness of these crowns in restoring primary molars in children, based on FDI World Dental Federation criteria over a 6-month period.
Materials and Methods:
Four pediatric patients, aged between 4 to 9 years, requiring caries or endodontic management were selected. Standardized protocols for prefabricated Zirconia crowns or Bioflx crowns placement were followed. Clinical evaluations were conducted on the basis of Functional, Biological and Aesthetic parameters at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up period.
Results:
Zirconia crowns demonstrated superior aesthetics, color stability, and long-term durability, whereas Bioflx crowns offered advantages in terms of minimal tooth preparation, ease of placement, and adaptability. Both crown types performed satisfactorily across all clinical parameters.
Conclusion:
Both Zirconia and Bioflx crowns are effective aesthetic alternatives for restoring primary molars. Their selection should be based on clinical needs and patient-specific factors.
Key-words: Bioflx crown, Zirconia crown, Pediatric dentistry, Aesthetic full-coronal restorations, FDI criteria