Evaluation of Three- Dimensional Rhombic Plate in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Subcondylar Fractures of Mandible: A Pilot Study

  • Dr. Manpreet Singh Professor & Head Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad
  • Dr. Gagandeep Kaur
  • Dr. Naman Mundepi
  • Dr. Jatin Dhingra
  • Dr Gaurav Verma Professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad
  • Dr. Barkha Adwani
Keywords: Mandible; Condyle; Subcondylar; Fracture; Reduction; Fixation; Rhombic; ORIF

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Fractures of condyle of mandible are quite common and it constitutes about 25% to 50% of mandibular fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these fractures may range from use of 1 or 2 miniplates to the use of 3- dimensional (3-D) titanium plates. In recent times 3-D plates of different geometrical configurations are being used. These geometrical configurations are delta, trifix, rhombic and trapezoidal. This study was done to explore the efficacy of 3-D rhombic plate for ORIF of subcondylar fractures of the mandible. 

  

Aim & Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3-D rhombic plate for ORIF of subcondylar fractures of mandible in terms of stability of fixation and to document the associated postoperative complications.

 

Material & Methods: This non-randomized clinical trial was conducted in 10 patients having isolated mandibular subcondylar fracture with disturbed occlusion. The ORIF of subcondylar fracture was done by using transparotid approach followed by fixation with 3-D titanium rhombic plate & 6 mm titanium screws. The primary outcome variables assessed were stability of fixation (as indicated by stable occlusion), restoration of jaw function in terms of mandibular movement (as assessed by maximum mouth opening) and bite force registration. The secondary outcome variables were postoperative complications such as infection, wound dehiscence, parotid fistula, facial nerve injury and hardware failure. Additionally, these complications were categorized according to degree of severity and recovery pattern with or without management. The parameters under evaluation were assessed at different time intervals at 1st, 7th, 15th day, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. The data obtained was statistically analysed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software package (SPSS 16 Inc, Chicago IL, USA).

 

Results & Observations: The age of the patients involved in the study ranges from 19 to 50 years with the mean age of 28.4±8.9 years. Out of 10 patients, 8 were males (80%) and 2 were females (20%). The occlusion was disturbed pre-operatively in all the patients enrolled in the study which was an essential inclusion criterion of the study. At 1st and 7 postoperative day the occlusion was stable in 7 patients (70%) and was deranged in 3 patients (30%). After elastic traction the occlusion was achieved and maxilla-mandibular fixation (MMF) was applied for 1 week. The occlusion remains stable in all the patients at 1st and 3rd months postoperatively. When maximum mouth opening was assessed, it was restricted at 1st postoperative day. There was statistically significant improvement in mouth opening at each time interval postoperatively. When bite force was evaluated post-operatively, there was statistically significant improvement at each time interval. When postoperative complications were considered, there was only 1 case of wound dehiscence and 1 case of facial paralysis. We have not encountered any case of postoperative infection, parotid fistula and hardware failure postoperatively.   

 

Conclusion: The use of rhombic plate for ORIF of subcondylar fractures is quite promising and is associated with fewer complications. However, long term studies with larger sample size are necessary to make some definite recommendations.  

Author Biographies

Dr. Manpreet Singh, Professor & Head Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad

Professor & Head

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad

Dr. Gagandeep Kaur

Professor

Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics

Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad

Dr. Naman Mundepi

Postgraduate Student

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad

Dr. Jatin Dhingra

Reader

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

Himachal Institute of Dental Sciences, Paonta Sahib

Dr. Barkha Adwani

Postgraduate Student

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

Kothiwal Dental College & Research Centre, Moradabad

References

References:
1. Oji C. Jaw fractures in Enugu, Nigeria. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 1999;37:106-109.
2. Israr M, Shah AA. Retrospective study of zygomatic complex fracture in Sheffield, England. Pakistan Oral Dental Journal. 2001,21:50-59.
3. Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, el-Attar A. Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2137 cases. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology. 1985;59:120-129.
4. Haug RH, Assael LA. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of subcondylar fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2001;59:370-375.
5. Schneider M, Erasmus F, Gerlach KL, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment and maxillomandibular fixation of fractures of the mandibular condylar process: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study with special evaluation of fracture level. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;66:2537-2544.
6. MAIN RTICLE
7. Champy M, Lodde JP, Jaeger JH, Wilk A. Mandibular osteosynthesis according to Michelet technic. I. Biomedical Biomedical bases (Article in French). Rev Stomatology Chir Maxillofacial. 1976;77:569-576.
8. Meyer C, Kahm JL, Boutemi P, Wilk A. Photoelastic analysis of bone deformation in the region of the mandibular condyle during mastication. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surery. 2002;30:160-169.
9. Farmand M. Three- dimensional plate fixation of fractures and osteotomies. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 1995;3:39-56.
10. MUNDEPI
11. Ellis E 3rd , Throckmorton G. Facial asymmetry after closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2000;58:719-728.
12. Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Murakami K, Sugimura M. A comparative evaluation of osteosynthesis with lag screws, miniplates, or kirschner wires for mandibular condylar process fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2001;59:1161-1169.
13. Walker RV. Condylar fractures: nonsugical management. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1994;52:1185-1188.
14. Silvennoinen U, Iizuka T, Lindqvist C, Oikarinen K. Different patterns of condylar fractures: An analysis of 382 patients in a 3-year period. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1992;50:1032-1037.
15. Choi BH, Huh JY, Yoo JH. Computed tomographic findings of the fractured mandibular condyle after open reduction. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003;32:469-473.
16. Kallela I, Soderholm AL, Paukku P, Lindqvist C. Lag screw osteosynthesis of mandibular condyle fractures. A clinical and radiological study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacaial Surgery 1995;52:1397-1404.
17. Meyer C, Serhir L, Boutemi P. Experimental evaluation of three osteosynthesis devices used for stabilizing condylar fractures of the mandible. Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery 2006;44:173-181.
Published
2026-01-06
How to Cite
Dr. Manpreet Singh, Dr. Gagandeep Kaur, Dr. Naman Mundepi, Dr. Jatin Dhingra, Dr Gaurav Verma, & Dr. Barkha Adwani. (2026). Evaluation of Three- Dimensional Rhombic Plate in Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Subcondylar Fractures of Mandible: A Pilot Study. UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.21276/ujds.2025.11.4.16